|
Global warming
is the observed increase in the average temperature of the
Earth's near surface air and oceans in recent decades and its
projected continuation. Models referenced by the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) predict that
global temperatures are likely to increase by 1.1 to 6.4 °C (2.0
to 11.5 °F) between 1990 and 2100. The uncertainty in this range
results from two factors: differing future greenhouse gas
emission scenarios, and uncertainties regarding climate
sensitivity.
|
Global
average near-surface atmospheric temperature rose 0.74 ±
0.18 °Celsius (1.3 ± 0.32 °Fahrenheit) in the last
century. The prevailing scientific opinion on climate
change is that "most of the observed increase in
globally averaged temperatures since the mid-20th
century is very likely due to the observed increase in
anthropogenic greenhouse gas concentrations," which
leads to warming of the surface and lower atmosphere by
increasing the greenhouse effect. Greenhouse gases are
released by activities such as the burning of fossil
fuels, land clearing, and agriculture. Other phenomena
such as solar variation and volcanoes have had smaller
but non-negligible effects on global mean temperature
since 1950. A few scientists disagree about the primary
causes of the observed warming.
|
|
 |
|
An
increase in global temperatures can in turn cause other
changes, including a rising sea level and changes in the
amount and pattern of precipitation. These changes may
increase the frequency and intensity of extreme weather
events, such as floods, droughts, heat waves,
hurricanes, and tornadoes. Other consequences include
higher or lower agricultural yields, glacier retreat,
reduced summer streamflows, species extinctions and
increases in the ranges of disease vectors. Warming is
expected to affect the number and magnitude of these
events; however, it is difficult to connect particular
events to global warming. Although most studies focus on
the period up to 2100, even if no further greenhouse
gases were released after this date warming (and sea
level) would be expected to continue to rise for more
than a millennium, since carbon dioxide (CO2) has a long
average atmospheric lifetime. |
|
 |
Remaining
scientific uncertainties include the exact degree of climate
change expected in the future, and especially how changes will
vary from region to region across the globe. A hotly contested
political and public debate also has yet to be resolved,
regarding whether anything should be done, and what could be
cost-effectively done to reduce or reverse future warming, or to
deal with the expected consequences. Most national governments
have signed and ratified the Kyoto Protocol aimed at combating
global warming.
Terminology:
The term global warming is a specific example of the broader
term climate change, which can also refer to global cooling. In
principle, global warming is neutral as to the period or causes,
but in both common and scientific usage the term generally
refers to recent warming and implies a human influence. The
UNFCCC uses the term "climate change" for human-caused change,
and "climate variability" for other changes. Some organizations
use the term "anthropogenic climate change" for human-induced
changes.
History of warming / Temperature record:
Relative to the period 1860–1900, global temperatures on both
land and sea have increased by 0.75 °C (1.4 °F), according to
the instrumental temperature record; the urban heat island is
not believed to be significant. Since 1979, land temperatures
have increased about twice as fast as ocean temperatures (0.25
°C/decade against 0.13 °C/decade) (Smith, 2005). Temperatures in
the lower troposphere have increased between 0.12 and 0.22 °C
(0.22 and 0.4 °F) per decade since 1979, according to satellite
temperature measurements. Over the one or two thousand years
before 1850, temperature is believed to have been relatively
stable, with possibly regional fluctuations such as the Medieval
Warm Period or the Little Ice Age.
Based on estimates by
NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies, 2005 was the
warmest year since reliable, widespread instrumental
measurements became available in the late 1800s,
exceeding the previous record set in 1998 by a few
hundredths of a degree. Estimates prepared by the World
Meteorological Organization and the UK Climatic Research
Unit concluded that 2005 was the second warmest year,
behind 1998.
The attribution of recent climate change is clearest for
the most recent period of the last 50 years, for which
the most detailed data are available.
Note that the anthropogenic emissions of other
pollutants—notably sulphate aerosols—exert a cooling
effect; this partially accounts for the plateau/cooling
seen in the temperature record in the middle of the
twentieth century, though this may also be due to
intervening natural cycles. |
|
 |
Causes /
Attribution of recent climate change and Scientific opinion on
climate change:
Carbon dioxide during the last 400,000 years and the rapid rise
since the Industrial Revolution; changes in the Earth's orbit
around the Sun, known as Milankovitch cycles, are believed to be
the pacemaker of the 100,000 year ice age cycle.
The climate system varies through natural, internal processes
and in response to variations in external "forcing" from both
human and natural causes. These forcing factors include solar
activity, volcanic emissions, variations in the earth's orbit
(orbital forcing) and greenhouse gases. The detailed causes of
the recent warming remain an active field of research, but the
scientific consensus identifies greenhouse gases as the main
influence.
Contrasting with this consensus view, other hypotheses have been
proposed to explain all or most of the observed increase in
global temperatures, including: the warming is within the range
of natural variation; the warming is a consequence of coming out
of a prior cool period, namely the Little Ice Age; and the
warming is primarily a result of variances in solar radiation.
Adding carbon dioxide
(CO2) or methane (CH4) to Earth's atmosphere, with no
other changes, will make the planet's surface warmer.
Greenhouse gases create a natural greenhouse effect
without which temperatures on Earth would be an
estimated 30 °C (54 °F) lower, so that Earth would be
uninhabitable. It is therefore not correct to say that
there is a debate between those who "believe in" and
"oppose" the greenhouse effect as such. Rather, the
debate concerns the net effect of the addition of
greenhouse gases when allowing for compounding or
mitigating factors.
One example of an important feedback process is ice-albedo
feedback. The increased CO2 in the atmosphere warms the
Earth's surface and leads to melting of ice near the
poles. As the ice melts, land or open water takes its
place. Both land and open water are on average less
reflective than ice, and thus absorb more solar
radiation. This causes more warming, which in turn
causes more melting, and this cycle continues. |
|
 |
Due to the
thermal inertia of the Earth's oceans and slow responses of
other indirect effects, the Earth's current climate is not in
equilibrium with the forcing imposed by increased greenhouse
gases. Climate commitment studies indicate that, even if
greenhouse gases were stabilized at present day levels, a
further warming of about 0.5 °C (0.9 °F) would still occur.[10]
Greenhouse gases in the atmosphere / Greenhouse effect:
Recent increases in atmospheric CO2. The monthly CO2
measurements display small seasonal oscillations in an overall
yearly uptrend; each year's maximum is reached during the
northern hemisphere's late spring, and declines during the
northern hemisphere growing season as plants remove some CO2
from the atmosphere.
The greenhouse effect, first discovered by Joseph Fourier in
1824, and first investigated quantitatively by Svante Arrhenius
in 1896, is the process in which the emission of infrared
radiation by atmospheric gases warms a planet's surface. On
Earth, the major natural greenhouse gases are water vapor, which
causes about 36-70% of the greenhouse effect (not including
clouds); carbon dioxide, which causes 9-26%; methane, which
causes 4-9%, and ozone, which causes 3-7%.
| The atmospheric
concentrations of carbon dioxide and methane have
increased by 31% and 149% respectively above
pre-industrial levels since 1750. This is considerably
higher than at any time during the last 650,000 years,
the period for which reliable data has been extracted
from ice cores. From less direct geological evidence it
is believed that carbon dioxide values this high were
last attained 24 million years ago. About three-quarters
of the anthropogenic (man-made) emissions of carbon
dioxide to the atmosphere during the past 20 years are
due to fossil fuel burning. The rest of the
anthropogenic emissions are predominantly due to
land-use change, especially deforestation. |
|
 |
Future carbon
dioxide levels are expected to rise due to ongoing burning of
fossil fuels. The rate of rise will depend on uncertain
economic, sociological, technological, natural developments, but
may be ultimately limited by the availability of fossil fuels.
The IPCC Special Report on Emissions Scenarios gives a wide
range of future carbon dioxide scenarios, ranging from 541 to
970 parts per million by the year 2100. Fossil fuel reserves are
sufficient to reach this level and continue emissions past 2100,
if coal, tar sands or methane clathrates are extensively used.
|
Carbon
sink ecosystems (forests and oceans) are being degraded
by pollutants. Degradation of major carbon sinks results
in higher atmospheric carbon dioxide levels.
Positive feedback effects such as the expected release
of methane from the melting of permafrost peat bogs in
Siberia (possibly up to 70,000 million tons) may lead to
significant additional sources of greenhouse gas
emissions not included in IPCC's climate models.
The measure of the temperature response to increased
greenhouse gas concentrations and other anthropogenic
and natural climate forcing is climate sensitivity. It
is found by observational and model studies. This
sensitivity is usually expressed in terms of the
temperature response expected from a doubling of CO2 in
the atmosphere. The current literature estimates
sensitivity in the range of 1.5 to 4.5 °C (2.7 to 8.1
°F). |
|
 |
Solar
variation:
Modeling studies reported in the IPCC Third Assessment Report
(TAR) found that volcanic and solar forcing may account for half
of the temperature variations prior to 1950, but the net effect
of such natural forcing has been roughly neutral since then.[18]
The IPCC Fourth Assessment Report (AR4) gives a best estimate
for radioactive forcing from changes in solar activity of +0.12
watts per square meter. This is less than half of the estimate
given in the TAR. For comparison, the combined effects of all
human activity are estimated to be an order of magnitude greater
at +1.6 watts per square meter.
In a review of existing literature, Foukal et al. (2006)
determined both that the variations in solar output were too
small to have contributed appreciably to global warming since
the mid-1970s and that there was no evidence of a net increase
in brightness during this period.
Some scientists assert that a warming of the stratosphere, which
has not been observed, would be expected if there were a
significant increase in solar activity.
Some researchers (e.g. Stott et al. 2003) believe that the
effect of solar forcing is being underestimated and propose that
solar forcing accounts for 16% or 36% of recent greenhouse
warming. Others (e.g. Marsh and Svensmark 2000) have proposed
that feedback from clouds or other processes enhance the direct
effect of solar variation, which, if true, would also suggest
that the effect of solar variability was being underestimated.
In general, the IPCC describes the level of scientific
understanding of the contribution of variations in solar
irradiance to historical climate changes as "low."
The present level of
solar activity is historically high. Solanki et al.
(2004) suggest that solar activity for the last 60 to 70
years may be at its highest level in 8,000 years;
Muscheler et al. disagree, suggesting that other
comparably high levels of activity have occurred several
times in the last few thousand years. Solanki concluded
based on their analysis that there is a 92% probability
that solar activity will decrease over the next 50
years. Additionally, in 2005, researchers at Duke
University have found that 10–30% of the warming over
the last two decades may be due to increased solar
output.
|
|
 |
Effects of
global warming:
Some effects on both the natural environment and human life are,
at least in part, already being attributed to global warming.
Glacier retreat, ice shelf disruption such as the Larsen Ice
Shelf, sea level rise, changes in rainfall patterns, increased
intensity and frequency of hurricanes and extreme weather
events, are being attributed at least in part to global warming.
While changes are expected for overall patterns, intensity, and
frequencies, it is difficult or impossible to attribute specific
events (such as Hurricane Katrina) to global warming.
Some anticipated effects
include sea level rise of 110 to 770 mm (0.36 to 2.5
feet) by 2100, repercussions to agriculture, possible
slowing of the thermohaline circulation, reductions in
the ozone layer, increased intensity and frequency of
hurricanes and extreme weather events, lowering of ocean
pH, the spread of diseases such as malaria and dengue
fever, and mass extinction events.
Increasing extreme weather catastrophes are due to
increasing severe weather and an increase in population
densities. The World Meteorological Organization[26] and
the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency have linked
increasing extreme weather events to global warming, as
have Hoyos et al. (2006), writing that the increasing
number of category 4 and 5 hurricanes is directly linked
to increasing temperatures. |
|
 |
Similarly, Kerry
Emmanuel in Nature writes that hurricane power dissipation is
highly correlated with temperature, reflecting global warming.
Hurricane modeling has produced similar results, finding that
hurricanes, simulated under warmer, high-CO2 conditions, are
more intense than under present-day conditions. NOAA claims that
warming induced by greenhouse gas may lead to increasing
occurrence of highly destructive category-5 storms.
 |
|
Mitigation of global warming and Adaptation to global
warming:
The broad agreement among climate scientists that global
temperatures will continue to increase has led nations,
states, corporations and individuals to implement
actions to try to curtail global warming. Some of the
strategies that have been proposed for mitigation of
global warming include development of new technologies;
carbon offsets; renewable energy such as wind power, and
solar power; nuclear power; electric or plug-in hybrid
electric vehicles; non-fossil fuel cells; energy
conservation; carbon taxes; improving natural carbon
dioxide sinks; deliberate production of sulfate
aerosols, which produce a cooling effect on the Earth;
population control; carbon capture and storage; and
nanotechnology. Many environmental groups encourage
individual action against global warming, often aimed at
the consumer, and there has been business action on
climate change. |
Kyoto
Protocol:
The world's primary international agreement on combating global
warming is the Kyoto Protocol. The Kyoto Protocol is an
amendment to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate
Change (UNFCCC). Countries that ratify this protocol commit to
reduce their emissions of carbon dioxide and five other
greenhouse gases, or engage in emissions trading if they
maintain or increase emissions of these gases. Developing
countries are exempt from meeting emission standards in Kyoto.
This includes China and India, the second and third largest
emitters of CO2, behind the United States.
 |
|
Global climate model:
The geographic distribution of surface warming during
the 21st century calculated by the HadCM3 climate model
if a business as usual scenario is assumed for economic
growth and greenhouse gas emissions. In this figure, the
globally averaged warming corresponds to 3.0 °C (5.4 °F)
Scientists have studied global warming with computer
models of the climate. These models predict that the net
effect of adding greenhouse gases will be a warmer
climate in the future. However, even when the same
assumptions of fossil fuel consumption and CO2 emission
are used, the amount of predicted warming varies between
models and there still remains a considerable range of
climate sensitivity. |
Including model and future greenhouse gas uncertainty, the IPCC
anticipates a warming of 1.1 °C to 6.4 °C (2.0 °F to 11.5 °F)
between 1990 and 2100. They have also been used to help
investigate the causes of recent climate change by comparing the
observed changes to those that the models predict from various
natural and human derived forcing factors.
Climate models can produce a good match to observations of
global temperature changes over the last century. These models
do not unambiguously attribute the warming that occurred from
approximately 1910 to 1945 to either natural variation or human
effects; however, they suggest that the warming since 1975 is
dominated by man-made greenhouse gas emissions.
Most global climate
models, when run to predict future climate, are forced
by imposed greenhouse gas scenarios, generally one from
the IPCC Special Report on Emissions Scenarios (SRES).
Less commonly, models may be run by adding a simulation
of the carbon cycle; this generally shows a positive
feedback, though this response is uncertain (under the
A2 SRES scenario, responses vary between an extra 20 and
200 ppm of CO2). Some observational studies also show a
positive feedback.
The representation of clouds is one of the main sources
of uncertainty in present-generation models, though
progress is being made on this problem. There is also an
ongoing discussion as to whether climate models are
neglecting important indirect and feedback effects of
solar variability. |
|
 |
Ocean
acidification:
Increased atmospheric carbon dioxide increases the amount of CO2
dissolved in the oceans. Carbon dioxide gas dissolved in the
ocean reacts with water to form carbonic acid resulting in ocean
acidification. Since biosystems are adapted to a narrow range of
pH, this is a serious concern directly driven by increased
atmospheric CO2 and not global warming.
Relationship to ozone depletion:
Although they are often interlinked in the mass media, the
connection between global warming and ozone depletion is not
strong. There are five areas of linkage:
* The same carbon
dioxide radioactive forcing that produces near-surface
global warming is expected (perhaps somewhat
surprisingly) to cool the stratosphere. This, in turn,
would lead to a relative increase in ozone depletion and
the frequency of ozone holes.
* Conversely, ozone depletion represents a radioactive
forcing of the climate system. There are two opposed
effects: Reduced ozone allows more solar radiation to
penetrate, thus warming the troposphere instead of the
stratosphere; the resulting colder stratosphere emits
less long-wave radiation down to the troposphere, thus
having a cooling effect. Overall, the cooling dominates;
the IPCC concludes that "observed stratospheric O3
losses over the past two decades have caused a negative
forcing of the surface-troposphere system" of about
−0.15 ± 0.10 W/m2. |
|
 |
* One of the
strongest predictions of the greenhouse effect theory is that
the stratosphere will cool. Although this cooling has been
observed, it is not trivial to separate the effects of changes
in the concentration of greenhouse gases and ozone depletion
since both will lead to cooling. However, this can be done by
numerical stratospheric modeling. Results from the National
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Geophysical Fluid
Dynamics Laboratory show that above 20 km (12.4 miles), the
greenhouse gases dominate the cooling.
* Ozone depleting chemicals are also greenhouse gases,
representing 0.34 ± 0.03 W/m2, or about 14% of the total
radiative forcing from well-mixed greenhouse gases.
Relationship to global dimming:
Scientists have stated with 66-90% confidence that the effects
of volcanic and human-caused aerosols have offset some of global
warming, and that greenhouse gases would have resulted in more
warming than observed if not for this effect.
For comparison of the relative significance of these factors:
* The best estimate for the magnitude of radiative forcing from
the long-lived greenhouse gases CO2, CH4, and N2O alone is +2.3
watts/m2.
* Radiative forcing from the halocarbon class of long-lived
greenhouse gases is about +0.34 watts/m2.
* The cooling effects of aerosols are estimated to be:
o Direct cooling effects of -0.5 watts/m2
o Cloud albedo cooling effects of -0.7 watts/m2
* Total warming effects from post-industrial human activity
including the above and other cooling and warming factors are
estimated at +1.6 watts/m2.
Pre-human global warming:
The earth has experienced natural global warming and cooling
many times in the past. The recent Antarctic EPICA ice core
spans 800,000 years, including eight glacial cycles with
interglacial warming periods much hotter than current
temperatures. The chart also shows the time of the last glacial
maximum about 20,000 years ago.
It is thought by some geologists that a rapid buildup of
greenhouse gases caused the Earth to experience global warming
in the early Jurassic period, with average temperatures rising
by 5 °C (9.0 °F). Research by the Open University indicates that
this caused the rate of rock weathering to increase by 400%. As
such weathering locks away carbon in calcite and dolomite,
carbon dioxide levels dropped back to normal over roughly the
next 150,000 years.
|
Sudden
releases of methane from clathrate compounds (the
Clathrate Gun Hypothesis) have been hypothesized as a
cause for other past global warming events, including
the Permian-Triassic extinction event and the
Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum. However, warming at
the end of the last glacial period is thought not to be
due to methane release. Instead, natural variations in
the Earth's orbit (Milankovitch cycles) are believed to
have triggered the retreat of ice sheets by changing the
amount of solar radiation received at high latitude and
led to deglaciation. |
|
 |
Using
paleoclimate data for the last 500 million years Veizer et al.
(2000, Nature 408, pp. 698–701) concluded that long-term
temperature variations are only weakly related to carbon dioxide
variations. Most paleoclimatologists believe this is because
other factors, such as continental drift and mountain building
have larger effects in determining very long-term climate.
However, Shaviv and Veizer (2003) proposed that the biggest
long-term influence on temperature is actually the solar
system's motion around the galaxy, and the ways in which this
influences the atmosphere by altering the flux of cosmic rays
received by the Earth. Afterwards, they argued that over
geologic times a change in carbon dioxide concentrations
comparable to doubling pre-industrial levels, only results in
about 0.75 °C (1.35 °F) warming rather than the usual 1.5–4.5 °C
(2.7–8.1 °F) reported by climate models. They acknowledge (Shaviv
and Veizer 2004) however that this conclusion may only be valid
on multi-million year time scales when glacial and geological
feedback have had a chance to establish themselves. Rahmstorf et
al. argue that Shaviv and Veizer arbitrarily tuned their data,
and that their conclusions are unreliable.
Pre-industrial global warming:
Paleoclimatologist William Ruddiman has argued that human
influence on the global climate began around 8,000 years ago
with the start of forest clearing to provide land for
agriculture and 5,000 years ago with the start of Asian rice
irrigation.[43] He contends that forest clearing explains the
rise in carbon dioxide levels in the current interglacial that
started 8,000 years ago, contrasting with the decline in carbon
dioxide levels seen in the previous three inter-glacials. He
further contends that the spread of rice irrigation explains the
breakdown in the last 5,000 years of the correlation between the
Northern Hemisphere solar radiation and global methane levels,
which had been maintained over at least the last eleven
22,000-year cycles. Ruddiman argues that without these effects,
the Earth would be nearly 2 °C (3.6 °F) cooler and "well on the
way" to a new ice age. Ruddiman's interpretation of the
historical record, with respect to the methane data, has been
disputed. |